Professor Nora Gordon

University of California, San Diego

Office:  Economics 328                                                         

Email:  negordon@ucsd.edu

 

ECONOMICS 231 

PUBLIC ECONOMICS:  GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES

Mon./Wed. 11:00-12:20, Economics 304

http://econ.ucsd.edu/faculty/negordon/econ231/econ231home.html

 

This course covers the role of government expenditures in the economy.  We will begin with a discussion of optimal government expenditure and the public goods problem.  We then cover a sampling of topics at the intersection of political economy and public finance.  Next, we consider public finance in a system with multiple jurisdictions, and review empirical research on public education.  Each topic in the course will be motivated by the theoretical work in the relevant area, but the emphasis of the course is empirical.  A main goal of the course is to teach you how to conduct and evaluate empirical research on government expenditure programs.  The most important topics in government expenditures that are not included in this course are social insurance and redistribution, which are covered in Julie Cullen’s public economics course.  Taxation is covered in Roger Gordon’s public economics course and not in this course.

 

COURSE REQUIREMENTS:

 

This course requires a paper proposal (in two drafts), presentation of the final proposal, presentation of one assigned paper, one referee report, and a final exam.

 

Assignment

Due date

Weight in course grade

Presentation of assigned paper

Depends on paper chosen; sign up for paper in class April 2

5%

Meet with me before first draft

Before May 1, by appointment

 

First draft paper proposal

In class May 14

15%

Referee report

In class May 7

10%

Final paper proposal

June 6, by 4:30 p.m.

25%

Presentation of paper proposal

June 2 or 4

5%

Final exam

June 13

40%

 

Each student must meet with me individually at least once before May 1 to discuss the proposal before submitting a first draft.  Come to the meeting with a question—even if you suspect it is too broad or too narrow—and a list of at least four related papers you have found, including at least one unpublished paper. 

 

Academics frequently write referee reports for journals, advising editors whether to publish papers and if so, with what revisions.  These reports begin with a brief summary of the paper, but spend most of their (2-3 page single-spaced) text critiquing the paper and providing suggestions for improvement.  In order to ensure that you are familiar with the most recent research related to your paper proposal, you will write a referee report on an unpublished paper related to your topic (it is okay if the paper has been accepted for publication).  You can find unpublished papers through NBER, IZA, departmental working paper series, Google Scholar, SSRN, or the author’s webpage.  This paper need not be issued as part of any formal working paper series.

 

The first draft of the paper proposal (about 10 pages) will pose a question in public economics, motivate that question, and place it in the context of the existing literature.  The second draft must refine the first draft, and, additionally, describe an appropriate data set (that actually exists) and empirical methodology for answering the question.  You may write a theoretical paper if you prefer; we will discuss how theoretical paper will evolve between drafts on a case-by-case basis.  The goal of this assignment is for you to have a “blueprint” for carrying out an original research project.  I encourage you to discuss your progress and future directions with me frequently during this process.  More detailed paper proposal guidelines follow.

 

Note:  there will be no class Monday, April 14.  Instead, we will meet Friday, April 18 from 2:00-3:20 in Economics 304.

 

Paper proposal assignment guidelines

 

The format I describe here will help you set out the skeleton of an applied paper, which you can “fill in” after the class (as a second-year econometrics project or third-year paper, for example).  These guidelines are flexible and we can discuss what would be most useful on a case-by-case basis (for example, if you are further along with a project already, or if you wish to write a theoretical paper).  If you are just starting an applied project, however, these are the criteria I think are most helpful for eventually writing a paper, and therefore the criteria upon which the assignments will be graded. 

 

1.  Define your question

 

Getting started is often the most difficult part.  The point of this project is to move you beyond a point where you are interested in public economics, or even a more restricted area such as education policy, to a point where you can phrase your interest as a question.  Looking through articles (skim through the Journal of Public Economics) or unpublished papers (look through the Public Economics working paper series at the NBER online) will help you identify the appropriate scope for a question.  When in doubt, make it narrower to ensure that you will be able to answer it completely. 

 

2.  Motivate your question

 

You can do this in several ways.  It is crucial that you convince the reader that this is an interesting and important question, whether theoretically or for policy purposes or both.  This should happen right away, after stating the question.  You should also review the literature to the extent necessary to show interest in the general area and that this particular question is not well answered already.  Rather than writing a lengthy literature review on the broader topic, discuss the literature in relation to your question.

 

3.  Show that you will be able to answer your question (add to final proposal, not needed for first draft)

 

Discuss your empirical strategy and the data you plan to use.  Be very clear about how you will credibly identify exogenous variation and therefore estimate a causal relationship.  If you are using a new or unusual econometric method, review the methodological literature here as well.  In this case, discuss only the aspects that are necessary to understand your paper. 

 

A good strategy here is to start by thinking about what your ideal data would be, then see what data exist, and then decide if they are sufficient.  It is likely that you will first come up with some questions that are interesting, important, and unanswered, only to realize that they are unanswered for a reason.  Try not to be discouraged and to view it as part of the research process.  The more specific you can be about what you are going to do, the better.  Include equations to be specified and blank table shells for results. 

 

 

4.  Explain how you will interpret your findings (add to final proposal, not needed for first draft)

 

Now that you have your blank table shells, how should we interpret what eventually will fill them?  It is always good to put a coefficient reported in a table in a sentence so the reader can interpret it.  For now, you can call that coefficient “X” or whatever you like as a placeholder, but you should try writing the sentence.  This part of the assignment is important for helping you think about how specific the results are to your empirical setting (and remembering that local average treatment effects are local!). 


Class calendar (subject to revision)

 

Monday

Wednesday

Mar. 31

Introduction to course

What is public economics?

*Feldstein

Apr. 2

Sign up for paper to present

Externalities -- theory

*Laffont Ch. 1

Apr. 7

Externalities -- empirical

*Chay and Greenstone; Dee

Apr. 9

Public goods -- theory

*Laffont Ch. 2

*Apr. 14—no class meeting, rescheduled to Friday*

For Wed. Apr. 16

Public goods – empirical

*Andreoni; Fischel; Brunner & Sonstelie

Friday Apr. 18

 Social choice

*Laffont Ch. 4 and 5

Apr. 21

Empirical estimates of demand for public goods

            Hedonic estimates

            Demand analysis

*Black; Gyurko & Tracy; Gramlich & Rubinfeld

Apr. 23

Empirical estimates of demand for public goods

            Flypaper effect

*Gordon; Knight

Apr. 28

Political economy I

*Besley & Coate; Baron & Ferejohn

Apr. 30

Political economy II

*Cutler, Elmendorf, & Zeckhauser; Lee, Moretti, & Butler

May 5

Political economy:  endogenous borders

*Alesina & Spaolare; Alesina, Hoxby, & Baqir

May 7

Referee report due in class

Public finance with multiple jurisdictions

            Tiebout model

            Club goods

*Rubinfeld; Scotchmer

May 12

Public finance with multiple jurisdictions

            Empirical

*Farnham & Sevak; Hoxby

May 14

Paper proposal draft 1 due in class

Public finance with multiple jurisdictions

            Intergovernmental grants

            Empirical evidence on grants

*Baicker & Staiger; Cullen

May 19

Elementary and secondary education in the US

            School finance

*Fernandez & Rogerson; Hoxby

May 21

Elementary and secondary education in the US

            The production of education

*Hanushek; Jacob

May 26

Memorial Day

No class

May 28

Higher education

*Dynarski; Dynarski; Peltzman

June 2

Student research presentations

June 4

Student research presentations

FRIDAY June 6 Paper proposal draft 2 due

FRIDAY June 13 Final exam 11:30-2:30

 


 

READINGS:  Required readings are in bold.  Most should be on JSTOR. 

 

Index of Journal Abbreviations

AER = American Economic Review

EMA = Econometrica

JEL = Journal of Economic Literature

JEP = Journal of Economic Perspectives

JHR = Journal of Human Resources

JOLE = Journal of Labor Economics

JPE = Journal of Political Economy

JPubE = Journal of Public Economics

NTJ = National Tax Journal

QJE = Quarterly Journal of Economic

REStat = Review of Economics and Statistics

REStud = Review of Economic Studies

 

General References

 

A. Atkinson and J. Stiglitz, Lectures in Public Economics (New York: McGraw Hill, 1980).

 

A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics: Volumes 1 & 2 (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1985 and 1987).

 

*J. Laffont, Fundamentals of Public Economics (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988).  Note:  this is an e-book from UCSD library, not in UCSD bookstore, available new and used on Amazon.

 

G. Myles, Public Economics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

 

H. Rosen, Public Finance, 6th edition (New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002).

 

J. Stiglitz, Economics of the Public Sector, 2nd edition (New York: Norton, 1988).

 

Note:  Some papers listed as working papers may now be published in journals and not cited here.

 

0.  Introduction to the Course

 

*M. Feldstein, “The Transformation of Public Economics Research: 1970-2000,” Journal of Public Economics, 86.3 (December 2002), 319-26.

http://www.nber.org/feldstein/publiceconomics.html

 

 

1. Optimal Expenditure Policy

 

1.1 Externalities

 

J. Andreoni and A. Levinson, “The Simple Analytics of the Envrironmental Kuznets Curve,” Journal of Public Economics, v 80, 2001, 269-286.

 

A. L. Bovenberg and R. A. de Mooij, “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation,” American Economic Review, September 1994, 1085--1089.

 

*K. Chay and M. Greenstone, “The Impact of Air Pollution on Infant Mortality: Evidence from Geographic Variation in Pollution Shocks Induced by a Recession.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3) (August 2003).

http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=838

 

R. Coase, “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 1--44.

 

*T. Dee, “Are There Civic Returns to Education? Journal of Public Economics 88 (9), August 2004, 1697-1720.

http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/tdee1/Research/jpubec04.pdf

 

A. Dixit, and M. Olson, “Does Voluntary Participation Undermine the Coase Theorem?” Journal of Public Economics, June 2000, 309-336.

 

L. Ebrill and S. Slutsky, “Time, Congestion and Public Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 1982, 307--335.

 

D. Fullerton, “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: Comment,” American Economic Review, March 1997, 245--251.

 

D. Fullerton and G. Metcalf, “Environmental Controls, Scarcity Rents, and Pre-existing Distortions,” Journal of Public Economics, v 80, 2001, 249—67.

 

J. Greenwood and R. P. McAfee, “Externalities and Assymetric Information,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 1991, 103--122.

 

G. Harden, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science, 1968, December.

 

Laffont, Chapter 1.

 

G. Metcalf, “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation,” Journal of Public Economics, February 2003, 87(2), 313-322.

 

1.2 Efficient Public Goods Provision

 

A. Atkinson and N. Stern, "Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods," REStud 41 (1974), 119-128.

 

A. Atkinson and J. Stiglitz, Chapter 16.

 

C. Ballard and D. Fullerton, "Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods," JEP 6 (1992), 117-131.

 

R. Boadway and M. Keen, "Public Goods, Self-selection, and Optimal Income Taxation," International Economic Review 34 (1993), 463-78.

 

T. Gaube, "When do Distortionary Taxes Reduce the Optimal Supply of Public Goods?," JPubE 76 (2000), 151-180.

 

L. Kaplow, "The Optimal Supply of Public Goods and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation," NTJ 49 (1996), 513-533.

 

M. King, "A Pigouvian Rule for the Optimal Provision of Public Goods," JPubE 30 (1986), 273-292.

 

*J. Laffont, Chapter 2.

 

G. Myles, Chapter 9.

 

P. Samuelson, "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure," REStat 36 (1954), 387-389.

 

J. Wilson, "Optimal Public Good Provision with Limited Lump-Sum Taxation," AER 81 (1991), 153-66.

 

1.3 Voluntary Private Provision of Public Goods

 

J. Andreoni, "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving?," Economic Journal 100(401) (1990), 464-77.

 

*J. Andreoni, "An Experimental Test of the Public Goods Crowding Out Hypothesis," AER 83 (December 1993), 1317-27.

 

J. Andreoni and T. Bergstrom, "Do Government Subsidies Increase the Private Supply of Public Goods?," Public Choice 88 (1996), 295-308.

 

T. Bergstrom, L. Blume, and H. Varian, "On the Private Provision of Public Goods," JPubE 29 (1986), 25-49.

 

*E. Brunner and J. Sonstelie, "School Finance Reform and Voluntary Fiscal Federalism," Journal of Public Economics, 2003, 87(9-10) 2157-2185.

 

C. Clotfelter, Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), Chapters 1 and 2.

 

*W. Fischel, "Did Serrano Cause Proposition 13?," NTJ 42 (December 1989), 465-473.

 

L. Kaplow, "A Note on Subsidizing Gifts," JPubE 58 (1995), 469-78.

 

B. Kingma, "An Accurate Measurement of the Crowd-Out Effect, Income Effect, and Price Effect for Charitable Contributions," JPE 97 (1989), 1197-1207.

 

J. Ledyard, "Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research," in J. Kagel and A. Roth, eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 111-194.

 

E. Ley, "On the Private Provision of Public Goods, A Diagrammatic Approach," Investigaciones Economicas 20(1) (1996), 691-704.

 

J. Morgan, "Financing Public Goods by Means of Lotteries," REStud 67(4) (2000), 761-84.

 

R. Roberts, "Financing Public Goods," JPE 95 (1987), 420-437.

 

J. Weimann, "Individual Behavior in a Free Riding Experiment," JPubE 54 (1994), 185-200.

 

1.4 Providing Public Goods with Perfect and with Asymmetric Information

 

A. Atkinson and J. Stiglitz, Chapter 10.

 

R. Barnett, “Preference Revelation and Public Goods” in P. Jackson, ed., Current Issues in Public Sector Economics (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992), 94-131.

 

T. Bergstrom and R. Cornes, "Independence of Allocative Efficiency from Distribution in the Theory of Public Goods," EMA 51(6) (1983), 1753-1765.

 

Y. Chen and C. Plott, "The Groves Mechanism: An Experimental Study of Institutional Design," JPubE 59 (1996), 335-364.

 

Y. Chen and F. Tang, "Learning and Incentive-Compatible Mechanisms for Public Goods Provision: An Experimental Study," JPE 106 (1998), 633-62.

 

E. Clarke, "Multipart Pricing of Public Goods," Public Choice 8 (1971), 19-33.

 

T. Groves and J. Ledyard, "Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the `Free-Rider’ Problem," EMA 45(4) (1977), 783-809.

 

E. Lindahl, "Just Taxation - A Positive Solution," in R. Musgrave and A. Peacock, eds., Classics in the Theory of Public Finance (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994).

 

H. Varian, "A Solution to the Problem of Externalities When Agents are Well-Informed," AER 84 (December 1994), 1278-1293.

 

1.5 Social Choice Theory: The Median Voter Model

 

K. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values (Yale University Press, 1963).

 

T. Bergstrom, "When Does Majority Rule Supply Public Goods Efficiently?" Scandinavian Journal of Economics (1979), 216-226.

 

H. Bowen, "The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Resources," QJE 58 (1943), 27-48.

 

A. Caplin and B. Nalebuff, "On 64% Majority Rule," EMA 56 (1988), 787-814.

 

A. Denzau and R. MacKay, "Benefit Shares and Majority Voting," AER 66 (1976), 69-76.

 

T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, "The Swing Voter’s Curse," AER 86 (1996), 408-426.

 

T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, "Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information," EMA 65 (1997), 1029-58.

 

A. Gibbard, "Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result," EMA 41 (1973), 587-600.

 

*J. Laffont, Chapters 4 and 5.

 

J. Ledyard, "The Pure Theory of Large Two Candidate Elections," Public Choice 44 (1984), 7-41.

 

J. Levin and B. Nalebuff, "An Introduction to Vote-Counting Schemes," JEP 9(1) (1995), 3-26.

 

C. Plott, "A Notion of Equilibrium and its Possibility Under Majority Rule," AER 57 (1967), 787-806.

 

A. Sen, Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San Francisco: Holden Day, 1970), Chapters 1-3.

 

K. Shepsle, "Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models," American Journal of Political Science 23 (1979), 23-59.

 

N. Tideman and G. Tullock, "A New and Superior Process for Making Social Choices," JPE 84 (1976), 1145-1159.

 

1.6 Estimating the Demand for Public Goods

 

T. Bergstrom, D. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro, "Micro-based Estimates of Demand Functions for Local School Expenditures," EMA 50 (September 1982), 1183-1205.

 

*S. Black, “Do Better Schools Matter?  Parental Valuation of Elementary Education,” QJE 114(2) (1999), 577-.

 

D. Brookshire, M. Thayer, W. Schulze, and R. d'Arge, "Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches," AER 72(1) (1982), 165-177.

 

*J. Gyourko and J. Tracy, "The Structure of Local Public Finance and the Quality of Life," JPE 99 (August 1991), 774-806.

 

*E. Gramlich and D. Rubinfeld, "Micro Estimates of Public Spending Demand Functions and Tests of the Tiebout and Median Voter Hypotheses," JPE 90 (June 1982), 536-560.