h3 {mso-bidi-font-size:12pt;} span.SPELLE {mso-spl-e:yes;} span.GRAME {mso-gram-e:yes;}

UCSD                                                                                                                                                             winter 2006

 

 

 

Ethnic Studies 200B - Theories of Ethnic Studies: A Critique of (Post)Modern Critical Projects

 

Prof.: Denise Ferreira da Silva

Office Hours: Wednesdays 1:30 – 3:00p & Thursdays 3:30 – 5:00p or by appointment

Tel.: (858) 534 -3405 – dsilva@weber.ucsd.edu

 

Question:

How to locate the Ethnic Studies project? What sort of un-formulated questions and possible strategies of answering would constitute its particular modes of inquiry? The pieces discussed in this seminar challenge basic presuppositions informing modern constructions of the social (local, national, regional global) by excavating the grounds upon which modern projects and their discontents stand. This is not an exegetical exercise, though. Instead, we will tease these onto-epistemological fractures where the ghost of the racial (postcolonial/gender-sexual/economic) subaltern subject can be spotted.

 

TASK:

Our task in this seminar is to advance provisory formulations of few questions: What sort of critical interrogations of (im)possible strategies of power/knowledge this appearance inaugurates? Do these specters demarcate an epistemological corner from which Ethnic Studies can intervene as a critical interrogation of contemporary critical (onto-epistemological) projects? How?

 

EVALUATION:

Weekly e-mail comments (1,500 words)                                             40%

Discussion mediation                                                                          30%

Participation                                                                                        30%

­­­­­­­­­­­

Email Responses Guidelines

Each week you will email to everyone in the class a 1,500 word-long response to the assigned readings. In your response, you should: (a) identify the text(s)’s main concepts and formulations and (b) at least three questions (for discussion) which seek to clarify whether and how the conceptual framework developed by a given theorist informs our understanding of racial/global subjection.

 

Discussion Mediation Guidelines

Each week two or three students will be responsible for leading the seminar: (A) week two through week six - they will prepare an itinerary which -- drawing from the questions raised in the email responses -- will guide in class discussion; and (B) week seven through week ten - the itinerary will also include a summary of four recent texts in the field of racial/ethnic and global/postcolonial studies, which implicitly or explicitly uses the concepts and formulations introduced in the given week’s reading(s). Everyone will lead the seminar twice.

 

 

 

Itinerary:

 

01/12 - Introduction

 

Specters

01/19 - Avery Gordon, Ghostly Matters

 

Burial Grounds

01/26 - Jane Flax, Thinking Fragments

 

02/02 - J. K. Gibson-Graham, The End of Capitalism (as we knew it)

02/09 - Gayatri Spivak, A Critique of Postcolonial Reason

 

 

Hauntings

02/16 - Oyèrónké Oyěwùmi, The Invention of Women

02/23 - Laura Kang, Compositional Subjects

03/02 - Diane Nelson, A Finger in the Wound

 

Horizons

03/09 - Denise Silva, Homo Modernus

03/16 - Octavia E. Butler, Fledging