Political Science 204A,
Fall 2007
Research Design
Meetings: (all in Social Sciences Building Room 104)
Lectures:
Mondays, 9-10:30am
Discussion:
Wednesdays, either 9-10:20 or 10:30-11:50
Professors:
Clark
C. Gibson
ccgibson@ucsd.edu tkousser@ucsd.edu
The primary
text for this course is available at the UCSD bookstore for purchase:
Trochim, William
and James P. Donnelly. 2007. The
Research Methods Knowledge Base, 3rd Edition. Cincinnati,
OH, Atomic Dog Publishing.
All
other readings for this course will be made available on the course website
(http://weber.ucsd.edu/~tkousser/PS204b.htm) or in the graduate student lounge.
You
are expected to read all assigned materials and to be prepared to discuss them
at the class meeting for which they are assigned. While each week has lecture and discussion
sections, be prepared to discuss the readings at any time. There are four assignments
for the course, due as noted on the syllabus below. Late assignments will not
be accepted. Each assignment will be
worth 15% of your total grade, and the remaining 40% will be based on your
participation in classroom discussions.
Laptops will not be allowed during class meetings, since you actually
need to print the readings out to read them as actively as a course like this
requires, and we will not be meeting on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving
(November 21st).
Week 1 (October 1 and 3): Science and
the Scientific Method
Lecture
readings:
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapter 1
Discussion
readings:
1. Schwartz, Thomas. 1980. The Art of Logical Reasoning.
2. Friedman,
Milton, 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics, in Essays in Positive
Economics by Milton Friedman.
3. Weingast,
Barry. 1979. A Rational Choice
Perspective on Congressional Norms. American
Journal of Political Science 23: 245-62.
Week 2 (October 8 and 10): Methods of
Observation
Lecture (new version) Readings: Analogies Overheads
1. Geertz, Clifford. Thick Description. In Geertz,
Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation
of Cultures.
2. Curd, Martin and J. A. Cover. 1998. Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues.
pp.445-480.
Discussion
1. Fenno,
Richard. US House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration. Reprinted in Weisberg at. al.
2. White, Theodore H. 1961. The Making of the President, 1960.
Atheneum Publishers. Chapters 1-3.
3. Katzenstein, Peter
J. 1985. Small States in World Markets:
Industrial Policy in
Week 3 (October 15 and 17): Design,
Validity, and Disconfirmation
Lecture Readings:
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapter 7.
2. Cook, Thomas D. and Donald T. Campbell. 1979.
Quasi-Experimentation:
Design
and Analysis Issues for Field Settings.
Chapters 1 and 2.
Discussion
1. Campbell and
Ross, “Connecticut Crackdown
on Speeding,” Law and Society Review,
1968.
2. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, et al. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival.
MIT
Press. Chapters 2, 4-5.
3. Bartels,
Larry. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax
Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics 3:1, 15-31.
4. Lupia et al. 2005.
"Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters 'Simply Ignorant?' A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in 'Homer Gets a Tax
Cut.'"
Week 4 (October 22 and 24): Experimental
Design
Lecture
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapter 9
2.
Donald R. Kinder and Shanto Iyengar,
News That Matters, The
University of Chicago Press, 1987, Chapter 2.
3. Green, Donald P. and Alan S. Gerber. 2002.
Reclaiming the Experimental
Tradition in Political Science. In Political
Science: State of the Discipline, ed. by
Ira Katznelson
and Helen V. Milner.
4.
(recommended) Cook and Campbell, Chapter 8
Discussion
Readings:
1. Lupia, Arthur and
Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-14, 101-148.
2. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky.
1979. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-292.
3. Edward Miguel and Michael Kremer. 2004.
4.
“Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from an India-wide Randomized Experiment,” Raghabendra
Chattopadhyay NBER Working Paper 8615.
5. Sears, David O, 1986. "College Sophomores in the
Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of
Human Nature." Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology 51:515-530.
Assignment #1
due on October 29: Take a well known theory of politics. Derive from it a
hypothesis that is testable though an experiment. Design the basic outline of
an experiment to test the hypothesis you derived.
Week 5 (October 29 and 31): The Theory
of Measurement and Sampling
Lecture
Required:
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapters 2, 3.
2. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane,
and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry:
Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, Chapters
4-5.
Discussion
1. Christenfeld N., Philips, DP, and Glynn LM.
"What's in a Name: Mortality and the Power of Symbols" Journal of
Psychosomatic Research, 1999 Sep, 47(3): 241-54.
2. Gleditsch, Kristian,
and Michael Ward. 1997. Double Take: A Re-examination of Democracy and
Autocracy in Modern Politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:361-83.
3. Przeworski
also, Adam, et. al.
2000. Democracy and Development. New
York:
Cambridge
University Press.
Chapter 1, pp. 13-77.
4. Gastil, Raymond. 1986. Freedom in the World:
Political Rights and Civil
Liberties,
1985-1986. New York: Greenwood Press. Pp. 3-30.
5. Huber,
John and Charles Shipan. 2002. Deliberate
Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic
Autonomy. New York: Cambridge
University Press. Pp. 44-77 and 171-83.
Assignment #2 due on November
5. Analyze the data provided on rule of law and assess its validity (Keefer data and description).
Weeks 6-7 (November 5 lecture, November
7 and 14 discussions): Quasi-Experimental Designs
Lecture Readings:
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapter 10.
2. Cook and Campbell. Chapters
3, 5.
November 7
Discussion Readings:
1.
Crosier, Scott. John Snow: The London Cholera Epidemic of 1854. (on course website).
2. Jared Diamond, “A Natural Experiment
of History,” pp. 53-66 of Guns, Germs and
Steel, W.W. Norton and Company, 1999.
3.
Crook, Sara Brandes and John R. Hibbing, 1985. “Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes
in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the US House of Representatives” British
Journal of Political Science 15:207-226.
4.
Posner, Daniel N. 2004. The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in
Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.
American Political Science Review 98, 4 (November): 529-545.
November 14
Discussion Readings:
1. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. 2001. The
Colonial Origins of Comparative Development. American Economic Review 91: 1369-1401.
2. Donohue,
John, and Steven Levitt. 2001. The
Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime. Quarterly
Journal of Economics 116: 379-420.
3. Lake, David A. Hierarchy in International
Relations: Authority, Sovereignty, and the New Structure of World Politics. Chapter 6. Manuscript.
4.
Richard
A. Berk and Jan de Leeuw 1999. “An Evaluation of California's Inmate Classification System Using a
Generalized Regression Discontinuity Design,” Journal of the American
Statistical Association, Vol. 94, No. 448, pp. 1045-1052.
Assignment #3
due on November 19. Take an existing theory of politics. Derive a testable
hypothesis from it. Design a quasi-experiment to test this hypothesis.
Week 8 (November 19 and 26): Qualitative
Methods/Case Studies
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapters 6, 8.
2. King, Keohane, and Verba, Chapter 6.
3.
Discussion
1. Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1978. The International
System and Regime Formation: A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein. Comparative
Politics 10: 419-38.
2. Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma. Building State Capacity in
Latin America.
3. Dreze and Sen, “China and India” from Hunger and Public Action, Oxford University Press, 1989.
Assignment #4
due on December 3. Take an existing theory of politics. Derive a testable
hypothesis from it. Design a case study to test this hypothesis.
Week 9 (November 28): Designing
Validity
Readings:
1. Trochim and
Donnelly, Chapters 11, 12.1.
2.
Den Hartog,
Christopher and Nathan W. Monroe.
2005. “The Value of Majority Status: The Effect of Jeffords’s
Switch on Asset Prices of Republican and Democratic Firms.” Under
review at Legislative Studies Quarterly.
3. Daniel E. Ho, Kosuke Imai,
Gary King and Elizabeth A. Stuart, “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for
Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis,
Vol. 15 (2007): Pp. 199-236.
4. Bratton, Michael and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic Experiments in
Week 10 (December 3 and 10): The Role of
Science and Scientific Discovery
Readings for
Guest Lecture on Weird (Political) Science:
1. James Fowler and Chris Dawes, “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.”
2. Darren Shreiber,
“Political Cognition as Social
Cognition: Are We All Political Sophisticates?” in Marcus, George E., W.
Russell Neuman, Michael MacKuen,
and Ann N. Crigler, editors The Affect Effect:
Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior.
Discussion
Readings:
1. Curd and Cover, Chapter 1: Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos; Chapter 2: Kuhn, Kuhn; Chapter 4: Lipton, Popper, Hempel.
2. Green, Donald and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice. New
Haven:
3. Cox, Gary. 1999. The Empirical Content of
Rational Choice Theory: A Reply to Green and Shapiro. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 147-169.
462.
Special Bonus Week!!! Guest Starring Mat McCubbins,
December 12th, 9-10:30
Supplementary materials available on the
Internet:
An excellent
introduction to statistics and research design is Statistics at Square One --
http://bmj.com/collections/statsbk/index.shtml, see especially Chapter 5 --
http://bmj.com/collections/statsbk/5.shtml
Good websites
on statistics, econometrics, including free downloadable software for data
entry, data analysis, research design, hypothesis testing, document preparation
and presentation include:
http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/index.html
http://members.aol.com/johnp71/javasta2.html#Freebies
http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/soft.htm
Online readings
on the scientific method:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos//
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/lecturelist.html
http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/
http://www.brint.com/papers/science.htm
http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhnsnap.html
http://wwwcdf.pd.infn.it/~loreti/science.html
Useful online
articles on qualitative research:
http://bmj.com/cgi/reprint/325/7357/210.pdf
http://bmj.com/cgi/reprint/320/7226/50.pdf
http://bmj.com/cgi/reprint/322/7294/1115.pdf
http://bmj.com/cgi/reprint/324/7344/1003.pdf